I agree with it in 100%, and also think that those user interface should be optional, meaning that the user would have the choice to have it or not. Maybe manufacturer could provide packages that provide ways to enable those hardware(or only software) features that make that device have the differentiation factor among others.
I believe that openness and excess seems to me exaggerated and counterproductive. Not only the launcher, like many other things. The lauchers of each brand should pasar approval by Google in the sense of the experience is not too different and a user does not become disoriented when going from one brand to another. Then we have a serious problem in the building. Each constructor puts the micro USB input and headphone input right where he wants. The result? The brands that build docks audio, do not risk building a dock where the amount of compatible device is reduced. Apple was smart this item. The Android smartphones should have a standard micro USB input where the input and headphones were at the bottom and an equal distance from each other on all devices. Thus and so would almost instantly appear on the market tens or hundreds of audio docks, because builders would know that your dock would serve for all Android devices. In my opinion both inputs should be on the left. Gains would be different. First, it would be different from other competing brands. Second, all of which use a side pocket using the belt could use and listen to music at the same time. Third, an audio dock would allow watching movies and videos. Furthermore, leaving maximum freedom to manufacturers to make Android smartphones, in the case of high-end devices, which are the beacon system Andoid, Google should be able to give your opinion. The Samsung Galaxy S3 is currently the best Android smartphone, if not the best smartphone in the world. But minor changes such as having the frame side in a more noble material such as titanium, aluminum or steel, or until the rear cover on carbon, Kevlar or other metal, the air would hi end that SGS3 should have and have not. Here are those suggestions. I hope I helped.
Follow
I agree with it in 100%, and also think that those user interface should be optional, meaning that the user would have the choice to have it or not. Maybe manufacturer could provide packages that provide ways to enable those hardware(or only software) features that make that device have the differentiation factor among others.
ReplyDeleteI believe that openness and excess seems to me exaggerated and counterproductive. Not only the launcher, like many other things. The lauchers of each brand should pasar approval by Google in the sense of the experience is not too different and a user does not become disoriented when going from one brand to another. Then we have a serious problem in the building. Each constructor puts the micro USB input and headphone input right where he wants. The result? The brands that build docks audio, do not risk building a dock where the amount of compatible device is reduced. Apple was smart this item. The Android smartphones should have a standard micro USB input where the input and headphones were at the bottom and an equal distance from each other on all devices. Thus and so would almost instantly appear on the market tens or hundreds of audio docks, because builders would know that your dock would serve for all Android devices. In my opinion both inputs should be on the left. Gains would be different. First, it would be different from other competing brands. Second, all of which use a side pocket using the belt could use and listen to music at the same time. Third, an audio dock would allow watching movies and videos. Furthermore, leaving maximum freedom to manufacturers to make Android smartphones, in the case of high-end devices, which are the beacon system Andoid, Google should be able to give your opinion. The Samsung Galaxy S3 is currently the best Android smartphone, if not the best smartphone in the world. But minor changes such as having the frame side in a more noble material such as titanium, aluminum or steel, or until the rear cover on carbon, Kevlar or other metal, the air would hi end that SGS3 should have and have not. Here are those suggestions. I hope I helped.
ReplyDeletethank you